| Author | Content | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
PROWLER |
From the other thread .....
Immediately before the patch I was getting 0.1 dex per 3.6% at the BLGs (str 159/ dex 165) Immediately after the patch I was getting 0.1 dex per 7.0% at the BLGs (str 159/dex 165) It therefore "appears" that dex gains were nerfed in the patch. Isylver says they didn't touch it ... I don't see how that is possible. I know the GMs don't offer gameplay advice but nothing else has changed (only the patch) and other people with higher STR report 0.1 dex per 3.52% Can this be looked at please iSylver? Thank you Prowler
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="PROWLER"]From the other thread .....
Immediately before the patch I was getting 0.1 dex per 3.6% at the BLGs (str 159/ dex 165)
Immediately after the patch I was getting 0.1 dex per 7.0% at the BLGs (str 159/dex 165)
It therefore "appears" that dex gains were nerfed in the patch.
Isylver says they didn't touch it ... I don't see how that is possible. I know the GMs don't offer gameplay advice but nothing else has changed (only the patch) and other people with higher STR report 0.1 dex per 3.52%
Can this be looked at please iSylver?
Thank you
Prowler
[/quote]
|
#1 2018/09/16 21:40:41 |
|
ISYLVER [Staff] |
Genuinely nothing has changed - could it be you missed .1 dex? And thats why you think it took 7%
|
#2 2018/09/17 07:44:49 |
|
PROWLER |
No bud, that's the first thing I thought of.
I did this at BLGs, then the trolls (I know the trolls return the same stats below 171 str) I have messaged Finito .... I don't know if he knows anything that you don't already know though Thanks for staying involved. 8) Prowler
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="PROWLER"]No bud, that's the first thing I thought of.
I did this at BLGs, then the trolls (I know the trolls return the same stats below 171 str)
I have messaged Finito .... I don't know if he knows anything that you don't already know though
Thanks for staying involved.
8)
Prowler
[/quote]
|
#3 2018/09/17 08:18:46 |
|
FRINGE |
write a book about it ;)
|
#4 2018/09/18 05:19:20 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply