Author | Content | Date |
---|---|---|
CYROX |
Imo 3/2/1/1/1 is fair. I don't agree with starting on 2/2, 3 should be your starting point as a minimum.
|
#16 2013/11/13 18:15:46 |
MONSTER |
Getting 100% eva on monsters u train on is pretty silly, i hope it stays low so its actualy hard to achieve 100% on monsters, Pvp is a different matter but aslong as accuracy is the same there shouldnt be a problem
|
#17 2013/11/13 18:21:59 |
FUJITORA |
No one will be getting 100% eva on anything any time soon, there is -5% eva on hero boots and -7%/-5% on dodge already...
If you read the point i am suggesting changing the first two upgrades from 3 1 to 2 2 to increase the incentive to get to +2 Considering how low the %'s are atm, i dont see any harm in making the first two upgrades give +3 then +2 and +1s after... (A total 1% gain on the current way it is) So +2 you will have +5%, (Instead of 7% previously...
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="FUJITORA"]No one will be getting 100% eva on anything any time soon, there is -5% eva on hero boots and -7%/-5% on dodge already...
If you read the point i am suggesting changing the first two upgrades from 3 1 to 2 2 to increase the incentive to get to +2
Considering how low the %'s are atm, i dont see any harm in making the first two upgrades give +3 then +2 and +1s after... (A total 1% gain on the current way it is)
So +2 you will have +5%, (Instead of 7% previously...[/quote]
|
#18 2013/11/13 18:47:23 |
MONSTER |
So u want it buffed, it was nerfed for a reason is all im gunna say
|
#19 2013/11/13 18:55:48 |
GANDALF |
I personally don't think it needs changing,
Eva/Acc should be hard to make an it is... some players will be happy with +1 3% some will be driven to get to a minimum of +3 5% 3% set with hero boots compared to a 5% set is an extra 6% eva/acc plenty more considerings frogs are not exactly rare on here compared to esoma.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="GANDALF"]I personally don't think it needs changing,
Eva/Acc should be hard to make an it is...
some players will be happy with +1 3%
some will be driven to get to a minimum of +3 5%
3% set with hero boots compared to a 5% set is an extra 6% eva/acc plenty more considerings frogs are not exactly rare on here compared to esoma.
[/quote]
|
#20 2013/11/13 18:58:42 |
FUJITORA |
If you read the point i am suggesting changing the first two upgrades from 3 1 to 2 2 to increase the incentive to get to +2 That was the main thing i was trying to imply, even if the 1% extra i suggested isnt added in +3 will still be 5% +1 = 2% +2 = 4% +3 = 5%
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="FUJITORA"][quote=]If you read the point i am suggesting changing the first two upgrades from 3 1 to 2 2 to increase the incentive to get to +2 [/quote]
That was the main thing i was trying to imply, even if the 1% extra i suggested isnt added in
+3 will still be 5%
+1 = 2%
+2 = 4%
+3 = 5%[/quote]
|
#21 2013/11/13 19:10:19 |
MONSTER |
Does this not just make the 'Rich' get more eva faster than the poor if they cant afford 100s of frogs if the first is nerfed to 2% and the next is also 2% instead of 1%, causing even more of a gap between the high and lows
|
#22 2013/11/13 19:14:12 |
FUJITORA |
Not really, with the amount of frogs people get at prisms, everyone and anyone who hunts them will be able to make +2s.
|
#23 2013/11/13 19:17:27 |
SCOIN |
No change needed imo.
|
#24 2013/11/13 21:04:47 |
GHOSTLORD |
"FUJITORA"Not really, with the amount of frogs people get at prisms, everyone and anyone who hunts them will be able to make +2s. The point with +1 is that it hardly has a chance to fail. In the end youwill most likely be better off as it is now.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="GHOSTLORD"][quote="FUJITORA"]Not really, with the amount of frogs people get at prisms, everyone and anyone who hunts them will be able to make +2s.[/quote]
The point with +1 is that it hardly has a chance to fail. In the end youwill most likely be better off as it is now.[/quote]
|
#25 2013/11/14 11:26:00 |
JIRAIYA |
"GHOSTLORD" Can you clarify what you mean? Hardly has a chance to fail? On the test server after 1 year+ of being capped level and only farming frogs for upgrades (this includes no mercy at elder druids before their dex increase) there was basically 1 set of armor at +3, everyone was stuck at +1 sets because of upgrade fail %s.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="JIRAIYA"][quote="GHOSTLORD"]
The point with +1 is that it hardly has a chance to fail. In the end youwill most likely be better off as it is now.[/quote]
Can you clarify what you mean?
Hardly has a chance to fail? On the test server after 1 year+ of being capped level and only farming frogs for upgrades (this includes no mercy at elder druids before their dex increase) there was basically 1 set of armor at +3, everyone was stuck at +1 sets because of upgrade fail %s.
[/quote]
|
#26 2013/11/15 04:20:40 |
GHOSTLORD |
"JIRAIYA""GHOSTLORD" As you get higher upgrades you have a higher chance to fail.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="GHOSTLORD"][quote="JIRAIYA"][quote="GHOSTLORD"]
The point with +1 is that it hardly has a chance to fail. In the end youwill most likely be better off as it is now.[/quote]
Can you clarify what you mean?
Hardly has a chance to fail? On the test server after 1 year+ of being capped level and only farming frogs for upgrades (this includes no mercy at elder druids before their dex increase) there was basically 1 set of armor at +3, everyone was stuck at +1 sets because of upgrade fail %s.
[/quote]
As you get higher upgrades you have a higher chance to fail.[/quote]
|
#27 2013/11/15 12:35:36 |
SCOIN |
lol
|
#28 2013/11/15 13:01:51 |
FUJITORA |
Understand that it was nerfed for a reason, but i still think 3 1 1 1 is just a joke tbh, but i guess im the only one...
Either way i finally found the success rate table: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AomDuVUMhV3mdGpPQTdPYzlKaWIzODRFR3ZSRGI2TUE#gid=0
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="FUJITORA"]Understand that it was nerfed for a reason, but i still think 3 1 1 1 is just a joke tbh, but i guess im the only one...
Either way i finally found the success rate table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AomDuVUMhV3mdGpPQTdPYzlKaWIzODRFR3ZSRGI2TUE#gid=0
[/quote]
|
#29 2013/12/05 16:23:34 |
IPHIOS |
"FUJITORA"Understand that it was nerfed for a reason, but i still think 3 1 1 1 is just a joke tbh, but i guess im the only one... Not quite following that table ;o MaxMAkeExp<100 = crafters skill <100 100-149 = skill between those numbers? ;o number in column below is percentage success rate? ;o
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="IPHIOS"][quote="FUJITORA"]Understand that it was nerfed for a reason, but i still think 3 1 1 1 is just a joke tbh, but i guess im the only one...
Either way i finally found the success rate table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AomDuVUMhV3mdGpPQTdPYzlKaWIzODRFR3ZSRGI2TUE#gid=0
[/quote]
Not quite following that table ;o
MaxMAkeExp<100 = crafters skill <100
100-149 = skill between those numbers? ;o
number in column below is percentage success rate? ;o[/quote]
|
#30 2013/12/05 16:49:28 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply