The Forum

GVW Video 19/12/2016

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

Author	Content	Date
GANONPK	Enjoy! PM Reply Quote [quote="GANONPK"][url=https://youtu.be/7k2wwCn7u_k]Enjoy![/url][/quote]	#1 2016/12/19 21:30:11
EVILCUTE	Called I was getting on stone ;) PM Reply Quote [quote="EVILCUTE"]Called I was getting on stone ;)[/quote]	#2 2016/12/19 21:40:45
SIR_ABSHOLOM	PM Reply Quote [quote="SIR_ABSHOLOM"] [/quote]	#3 2016/12/19 23:57:17
AZM0DAN	Good war enjoyed it :P PM Reply Quote [quote="AZM0DAN"]Good war enjoyed it :P[/quote]	#4 2016/12/20 00:37:16
SANDOKAN	Shame only a few of the capped players could be assed coming and were actually attacking (me, lupi, mm, lordgd) ... for some reason flick decided to make a video instead of attacking :P Hope to have inspired some of the other capped players ... respect to Faint for keep trying and hope to see some more capped players next gvw to make a decent chance! Aye they on 75% next gvw but there chars in other guilds aren't :) PM Reply Quote [quote="SANDOKAN"]Shame only a few of the capped players could be assed coming and were actually attacking (me, lupi, mm, lordgd) ... for some reason flick decided to make a video instead of attacking :P Hope to have inspired some of the other capped players ... respect to Faint for keep trying and hope to see some more capped players next gvw to make a decent chance! Aye they on 75% next gvw but there chars in other guilds aren't :)[/quote]	#5 2016/12/20 07:47:03
MICKYC	Well played Faint (and friends) that was the best GVW for a very long time! PM Reply Quote [quote="MICKYC"]Well played Faint (and friends) that was the best GVW for a very long time![/quote]	#6 2016/12/20 09:32:57
PIKUTIN	lol @ flick ^_^ PM Reply Quote [quote="PIKUTIN"]lol @ flick ^_^[/quote]	#7 2016/12/20 09:57:30
ADVENTI	Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point PM Reply Quote [quote="ADVENTI"]Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point[/quote]	#8 2016/12/20 19:12:56
HADOU	"ADVENTI"Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed. PM Reply Quote [quote="HADOU"][quote="ADVENTI"]Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point[/quote] Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed.[/quote]	#9 2016/12/20 19:39:15
OCD	"HADOU" "ADVENTI"Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed. Great point and totaly agree. As for the it being bypassed yes it could but no one is guild hopping from DL.. Dark_Legacy guild is 100% full of active semi active poeple so much so that there just is not room for everyone. No one has left to join other guilds specificly because of the % update I myself have not been in Dl for months... PM Reply Quote [quote="OCD"][quote="HADOU"][quote="ADVENTI"]Maybe the % should decrease by 10% each win? Whats going to happen when someone else wins? It should be similar to WoTW and the old owner goes up by 5% so they dont end up at 100% and have numerous uncompetitive wars. This whole % thing very easily bypassed as can be seen in this video where numerous DL or DL related chars are just going around attacking people in other guilds which sort of defeats the point[/quote] Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed.[/quote] Great point and totaly agree. As for the it being bypassed yes it could but no one is guild hopping from DL.. Dark_Legacy guild is 100% full of active semi active poeple so much so that there just is not room for everyone. No one has left to join other guilds specificly because of the % update I myself have not been in Dl for months...[/quote]	#10 2016/12/20 19:44:44
LUPISCUS	DL may not be guild hopping.... but DL ''people'' are in other guilds Aint moaning btw... credit to ya for having the players. Just makes the % reduction slightly redundant for other independent guilds to win gvw. Tho the % reduction is a step forward .. it aint working quite as qwick as was probably expected PM Reply Quote [quote="LUPISCUS"]DL may not be guild hopping.... but DL ''people'' are in other guilds Aint moaning btw... credit to ya for having the players. Just makes the % reduction slightly redundant for other independent guilds to win gvw. Tho the % reduction is a step forward .. it aint working quite as qwick as was probably expected[/quote]	#11 2016/12/20 20:00:08
ADVENTI	"HADOU" Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed. The whole point is that someone else will win eventually if you cap it at 80%, and other guilds dont win it kind of defeats the point. People want to see different winners every week, there should be no lower limit. PM Reply Quote [quote="ADVENTI"][quote="HADOU"] Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed.[/quote] The whole point is that someone else will win eventually if you cap it at 80%, and other guilds dont win it kind of defeats the point. People want to see different winners every week, there should be no lower limit.[/quote]	#12 2016/12/20 20:02:27
HADOU	"ADVENTI" "HADOU" Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed. The whole point is that someone else will win eventually if you cap it at 80%, and other guilds dont win it kind of defeats the point. People want to see different winners every week, there should be no lower limit. People would win it with us at 80% easy if they turned up. Rare turned up on his store character. Wtf they waiting for ? PM Reply Quote [quote="HADOU"][quote="ADVENTI"][quote="HADOU"] Should be capped at how low it goes tbh. Its already competitive at 80%. DL wont be competitive much lower which also defeats the point. When we do lose it we don't gain any % for the next war and gain 5% per war thereafter. Its one thing making it competitive. But if DL had uncontested gvw wins and went down to 5% through no fault of our own we wouldn't be able to compete for like 8 weeks which also defeats the purpose of the new %. So there needs to be a reasonable limit as to how far a guild can be nerfed.[/quote] The whole point is that someone else will win eventually if you cap it at 80%, and other guilds dont win it kind of defeats the point. People want to see different winners every week, there should be no lower limit.[/quote] People would win it with us at 80% easy if they turned up. Rare turned up on his store character. Wtf they waiting for ? [/quote]	#13 2016/12/20 20:15:12
NOTMAT	The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo. It should be used to make GVW's competitive. Not to make it a freebee once the % gets stupidly low, otherwise it will get the point where the guild on low % just won't turn up what so ever until its all the way back up. Then you're just back to square one with GVW being dead. PM Reply Quote [quote="NOTMAT"]The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo. It should be used to make GVW's competitive. Not to make it a freebee once the % gets stupidly low, otherwise it will get the point where the guild on low % just won't turn up what so ever until its all the way back up. Then you're just back to square one with GVW being dead.[/quote]	#14 2016/12/20 20:24:04
LUPISCUS	if a different guild won it... then the gvw would be busier, as other guilds would have the chance of winning it. Atm its still a 1 horse race.. DL were under 0 pressure at all last night, with a fair few attendees. Dl still had a load of players not even logged on..which they would if things had been a bit closer. Yes.. needs more hi levs from other guilds to attend... BUT atm.. it really isnt close..and with other hi lev players in other guilds...dl aint gona be losing soon. That.. is why ppl dont attend. It's been allowed to get too 1 sided for so long.... ppl have got cheesed off with it PM Reply Quote [quote="LUPISCUS"]if a different guild won it... then the gvw would be busier, as other guilds would have the chance of winning it. Atm its still a 1 horse race.. DL were under 0 pressure at all last night, with a fair few attendees. Dl still had a load of players not even logged on..which they would if things had been a bit closer. Yes.. needs more hi levs from other guilds to attend... BUT atm.. it really isnt close..and with other hi lev players in other guilds...dl aint gona be losing soon. That.. is why ppl dont attend. It's been allowed to get too 1 sided for so long.... ppl have got cheesed off with it[/quote]	#15 2016/12/20 20:27:27

Please sign in with one of your characters to reply

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>