| Author | Content | Date | 
|---|---|---|
| NOTMAT | 
									
										If people don't attend they don't have the right to complain about 1 guild keeping GV.
									 | #16 2016/12/20 20:35:43 | 
| LUPISCUS | 
									
										If dl continue to buy mega items from other players for cash.. u can hardly blame other ppl for not attending
									 | #17 2016/12/20 21:00:51 | 
| JHAELIEN | "NOTMAT"If people don't attend they don't have the right to complain about 1 guild keeping GV. This, % should also be capped or else it defeats the purpose. Not much point being so nerfed you can't defend your village. | #18 2016/12/20 21:02:07 | 
| LUPISCUS | 
									
										deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh
									 | #19 2016/12/20 21:04:29 | 
| HADOU | "NOTMAT"The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo. This. Not necessarily 80% but at 80% DL are struggling with a guild of lvl 80's ? 
											PM
											
											Reply
											Quote
											 [quote="HADOU"][quote="NOTMAT"]The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo.
It should be used to make GVW's competitive. Not to make it a freebee once the % gets stupidly low, otherwise it will get the point where the guild on low % just won't turn up what so ever until its all the way back up. Then you're just back to square one with GVW being dead.[/quote]
This. Not necessarily 80% but at 80% DL are struggling with a guild of lvl 80's ?
[/quote] | #20 2016/12/20 21:07:32 | 
| JHAELIEN | "HADOU""NOTMAT"The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo. Same thing I was about to post tbh. 
											PM
											
											Reply
											Quote
											 [quote="JHAELIEN"][quote="HADOU"][quote="NOTMAT"]The GVW % system should be capped at 80% imo.
It should be used to make GVW's competitive. Not to make it a freebee once the % gets stupidly low, otherwise it will get the point where the guild on low % just won't turn up what so ever until its all the way back up. Then you're just back to square one with GVW being dead.[/quote]
This. Not necessarily 80% but at 80% DL are struggling with a guild of lvl 80's ?
[/quote]
Same thing I was about to post tbh.[/quote] | #21 2016/12/20 21:08:45 | 
| LUPISCUS | "LUPISCUS"deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh dont forget this | #22 2016/12/20 21:09:20 | 
| MIKEYYB93 | 
									
										if people attended the % would be a none issue. the majority of the people there were lvl 70ish so hardly going to overthrow geared lvl 100s easily
									 | #23 2016/12/20 21:11:08 | 
| JHAELIEN | 
									
										Shouldn't be struggling vs level 80s not a direct complaint just making it known.
									 | #24 2016/12/20 21:11:49 | 
| LUPISCUS | "LUPISCUS""LUPISCUS"deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh ill keep bumping it if u try to hide it with waffle | #25 2016/12/20 21:12:00 | 
| EVILCUTE | 
									
										I dont get it: a) The person on the stone died twice, this means the GVW was winnable by other guilds b) barely any other chars attended linked to DL it was 90% DL. c) If people actually turned up instead of moaning about DL it would be really even. Stop complaining, if you want a change youve got to fight for it. You'll never go far in life with that attitude Lupi. 
											PM
											
											Reply
											Quote
											 [quote="EVILCUTE"]I dont get it:
a) The person on the stone died twice, this means the GVW was winnable by other guilds
b) barely any other chars attended linked to DL it was 90% DL.
c) If people actually turned up instead of moaning about DL it would be really even.
Stop complaining, if you want a change youve got to fight for it. 
You'll never go far in life with that attitude Lupi.[/quote] | #26 2016/12/20 21:12:59 | 
| JHAELIEN | 
									
										Was a decent war numbers wise, seems people just start throwing up complaints when they don't get the result they want. System could still use tweaking imo might need time.
									 | #27 2016/12/20 21:15:12 | 
| LUPISCUS | "LUPISCUS"deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh | #28 2016/12/20 21:16:09 | 
| EVILCUTE | "LUPISCUS""LUPISCUS"deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh Well done. | #29 2016/12/20 21:17:20 | 
| HAWKMOON | "LUPISCUS""LUPISCUS"deleting characters that are bought or in possession of bought items would be much more useful for the server tbh | #30 2016/12/20 21:17:50 | 
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply