Author | Content | Date |
---|---|---|
SOLITAIRE |
Hi
I am asking why shields have a gender requirement when weapons do not. I understand that armour is gender specific, but shields? isylver says they always have, but surely shields should be unisex what do people think? |
#1 2014/04/30 18:40:17 |
JARAGOONDOO |
I've always thought all armours should be unisex, but my idea was shot down months ago.
But I do agree with you Shields should be unisex at the very least. |
#2 2014/04/30 19:12:48 |
YOSHIMITSU |
I agree with this (Although I will never use a shield)
|
#3 2014/05/01 08:43:12 |
BRAINDATA |
Agree
|
#4 2014/05/01 10:39:07 |
I0_0I |
Most likely they originally had gender to effectively double the quantity of off hand items available in game.
Same question; Why have gender in game when there is no difference in the toon? What are there like, 5 colors (skin) in hsoma x 4 hair styles x 4 hair colors = 80 unique characters with gender 160 unique etc. Just sells better at the time.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="I0_0I"] Most likely they originally had gender to effectively double the quantity of off hand items available in game.
Same question; Why have gender in game when there is no difference in the toon?
What are there like, 5 colors (skin) in hsoma x 4 hair styles x 4 hair colors = 80 unique characters
with gender 160 unique etc.
Just sells better at the time.[/quote]
|
#5 2014/05/02 20:01:17 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply