The Forum

[quote="OPENTHEDOOR"][quote="DENZEL"][quote="OPENTHEDOOR"]With current situation of players and numbers you guys can break up your alliance until further notice Luther. [/quote] This was proposed multiple times to Korea/VK and everytime it was a firm no and they continued to PK the whole server, turning everyone against them. The current GV system does need an overhaul though as it only means the last 10 minutes are actually worth attending. [/quote] I am not sure what you talking about, I also don’t really in the grand scheme of things see that many players that have been “turned against” although it is fun to blame Tong. My comment was purely about GVW. Nobody has numbers to compete with an active DL. DL could go solo and still pick and choose when they want to win. I reckon you would get to 80% before anyone seriously challenged. [/quote]

[quote="DAENAERYS"][quote="CORLEONE"]Honestly a better idea would be to nerf/remove the tank class :)[/quote] Honestly 100% because again ud have the same guidls competeing with all their gear and economy isnt great, like it took me 3 months to get a nega bow to +4 with decent recoil ..... How are the smaller guilds meant to make +8 gear in a reasonable time frame to compete at these events [/quote]

[quote="LUTHER"][quote="SH1VS"]-1 whats stopping 3 or 4 guild going into hut surrounding entrance and just magic attacking anything that tries to get in. Very boring gvws.[/quote] This doesn't make any sense, that's exactly what happens now and this idea makes it way harder? Enemy guilds will just walk into the hut with you as well - you'll pretty much have to attack anyone not in your guild This idea obvs won't get a million +1's because it nerfs both alliances, but imo will make gvws much more strategic and fun and keep attendance high [/quote]

[quote="LUTHER"][quote="ISYLVER"]I like this idea but my stipulation is that you could only see your own guild and the defending guild names. Thus this way makes it harder for defenders to defend and easier for attackers to attack. [/quote] *edit* Hurt my brain thinking how this would effect things over time but i think it might result in two big defending guilds having an advantage over smaller guilds ? Might be fine though as it still mixes things up a bit and allows smaller guilds to be anonymous The whole thing is definitely a nerf to the defending guild/the stone holders i think anyway, especially at the end of the war when everyone is smashing the stone Perhaps its possible to show name/guild of whoever is on the stone? Also a possibility that only some gvws have this ffa format as there are so many currently [/quote]