Author | Content | Date |
---|---|---|
JPOT |
it seems its been abused so much, especially now, that the gms don't even care now, so can we get this in the rules that its allowed? making immunity pots pointless?
@TEMEROSO |
#1 2020/11/26 23:43:41 |
HELLOIMUNDER |
🎣
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="HELLOIMUNDER"][img]https://i.gyazo.com/71e03afbb1a14dea87bca9e0b33dd506.png[/img]
[img]https://i.gyazo.com/6cd129a05167e077e0bd28f657510653.png[/img]
[img]https://i.gyazo.com/4d401ca9057d8c3fb9c19e891d7e50bb.png[/img]
[img]https://i.gyazo.com/2096f0df2c460419be2882d3185442b9.png[/img]
🎣[/quote]
|
#2 2020/11/27 01:59:26 |
MIKELOWREY |
This is so broken, people will abuse this stuff in PVP too.
Fair enough it's too much to police people who do it a bit here and there. Absolute blatant abuse like this should be dealt with though, just making a mockery of game mechanics. |
#3 2020/11/27 05:03:50 |
EAC |
They still die twice.
You can take the piss out of them more this way than just taking 2 deaths? Non issue. |
#4 2020/11/27 07:55:14 |
HITME123 |
"EAC" Not true. If you know PVP is going to happen, get your immunity and you have an instant free stone where nobody can target you until you stone someone |
#5 2020/11/27 08:26:23 |
EAC |
"HITME123""EAC" Can you give any actual examples of this happening? I’d say I’ve pvp’ed most days for the last 2 months and I have never seen it happen. There are so many more things needed for this game than fixing someone dying twice for immunity from an alternate character.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="EAC"][quote="HITME123"][quote="EAC"]
Non issue. [/quote]
Not true. If you know PVP is going to happen, get your immunity and you have an instant free stone where nobody can target you until you stone someone [/quote]
Can you give any actual examples of this happening? I’d say I’ve pvp’ed most days for the last 2 months and I have never seen it happen.
There are so many more things needed for this game than fixing someone dying twice for immunity from an alternate character.
[/quote]
|
#6 2020/11/27 08:47:10 |
SOMCHAI |
Let's not get our panties ina twist. It's most beneficial for pve players who want to hunt in peace and likely won't PvP anyway. The odd pathetic player might do it for the 'free' stone mentioned above.
|
#7 2020/11/27 09:44:26 |
GRIMPIRATE |
Weddingcake to be made devil moral 2020
|
#8 2020/11/27 10:59:47 |
MIKELOWREY |
"EAC""HITME123""EAC" So if there was a way to dupe items in game, but there was no proof anyone had abused it yet, that'd be fine left as it is would it? So sick of these straw-man arguments from everyone, just blindly defending their side - transparent af. The fix would take about 5 seconds, send said abuser of game mechanics a message saying if this continues you will be banned - voila, nobody else with a brain cell will be doing it then.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="MIKELOWREY"][quote="EAC"][quote="HITME123"][quote="EAC"]
Non issue. [/quote]
Not true. If you know PVP is going to happen, get your immunity and you have an instant free stone where nobody can target you until you stone someone [/quote]
Can you give any actual examples of this happening? I’d say I’ve pvp’ed most days for the last 2 months and I have never seen it happen.
There are so many more things needed for this game than fixing someone dying twice for immunity from an alternate character.
[/quote]
So if there was a way to dupe items in game, but there was no proof anyone had abused it yet, that'd be fine left as it is would it?
So sick of these straw-man arguments from everyone, just blindly defending their side - transparent af.
The fix would take about 5 seconds, send said abuser of game mechanics a message saying if this continues you will be banned - voila, nobody else with a brain cell will be doing it then.[/quote]
|
#9 2020/11/27 11:08:50 |
KNUCKLES |
Weddingcake shouldn’t mouth off, keep up the good work temeroso
|
#10 2020/11/27 11:22:34 |
NITEFALL |
The fact you genuinely feel the need to kill someone twice and hour and are now moaning someone has beaten you too it lol
|
#11 2020/11/27 13:52:35 |
NITEFALL |
How can the gm police this?
If he kills himself on another charater or asks a friend to stop being harassed. What do you suggest. For the gms to check into every pk and make sure this was a proper fight? Or if the charaters knows or is infact affiliated with the other?
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="NITEFALL"]How can the gm police this?
If he kills himself on another charater or asks a friend to stop being harassed.
What do you suggest. For the gms to check into every pk and make sure this was a proper fight? Or if the charaters knows or is infact affiliated with the other?[/quote]
|
#12 2020/11/27 13:53:07 |
GRIMPIRATE |
I agree with you guys. Stuff like this can't be policed. What happens ingame is a community decision :)
|
#13 2020/11/27 14:03:59 |
HITME123 |
A GM could police it just like they would deal with anything else. Look into individual reports and deal with it on a case by case basis. It doesn't take long to check if someone was logged into 2 of the same accounts with the same IP. Otherwise, you can't police if it's friends killing friends as they could say they were legitimately PKing them
It sounds like a lot but if it was dealt with back when Isylver said it was against the rules and relevant punishments were handed out, people wouldn't take the piss and they wouldn't want to risk giving themselves immunity for 1 of their 3 strikes. No point in even discussing it any more though, Isylver has said it isn't bannable and won't be punishable
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="HITME123"]A GM could police it just like they would deal with anything else. Look into individual reports and deal with it on a case by case basis. It doesn't take long to check if someone was logged into 2 of the same accounts with the same IP. Otherwise, you can't police if it's friends killing friends as they could say they were legitimately PKing them
It sounds like a lot but if it was dealt with back when Isylver said it was against the rules and relevant punishments were handed out, people wouldn't take the piss and they wouldn't want to risk giving themselves immunity for 1 of their 3 strikes.
No point in even discussing it any more though, Isylver has said it isn't bannable and won't be punishable [/quote]
|
#14 2020/11/27 14:08:32 |
TEMEROSO |
I’m not weddingcake .... 🍺 😏
|
#15 2020/11/27 17:09:26 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply