The Forum

Players griefing themselves

1

Author	Content	Date
MY_UNICORN	Hi, I noticed a small number of players intentionally griefing themselves. This reminded me of something that happened on E-Soma involving a player called IMO. As I remember it, the idea was to intentionally die because HP gains were previously based on the amount of Strength gained within a single level, making it more efficient to restart under certain circumstances. I may be remembering this incorrectly or it may already have been addressed, but I just wanted to check whether this issue has already been resolved or considered before these changes are rolled out. Thanks. PM Reply Quote [quote="MY_UNICORN"]Hi, I noticed a small number of players intentionally griefing themselves. This reminded me of something that happened on E-Soma involving a player called IMO. As I remember it, the idea was to intentionally die because HP gains were previously based on the amount of Strength gained within a single level, making it more efficient to restart under certain circumstances. I may be remembering this incorrectly or it may already have been addressed, but I just wanted to check whether this issue has already been resolved or considered before these changes are rolled out. Thanks. [/quote]	#1 2026/08/02 12:25:50
SYLVERINE	"MY_UNICORN"Hi, I noticed a small number of players intentionally griefing themselves. This reminded me of something that happened on E-Soma involving a player called IMO. As I remember it, the idea was to intentionally die because HP gains were previously based on the amount of Strength gained within a single level, making it more efficient to restart under certain circumstances. I may be remembering this incorrectly or it may already have been addressed, but I just wanted to check whether this issue has already been resolved or considered before these changes are rolled out. Thanks. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 PM Reply Quote [quote="SYLVERINE"][quote="MY_UNICORN"]Hi, I noticed a small number of players intentionally griefing themselves. This reminded me of something that happened on E-Soma involving a player called IMO. As I remember it, the idea was to intentionally die because HP gains were previously based on the amount of Strength gained within a single level, making it more efficient to restart under certain circumstances. I may be remembering this incorrectly or it may already have been addressed, but I just wanted to check whether this issue has already been resolved or considered before these changes are rolled out. Thanks. [/quote] 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂[/quote]	#2 2026/08/02 12:28:29
ZUZU	I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. PM Reply Quote [quote="ZUZU"]I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. [/quote]	#3 2026/08/02 13:21:49
MY_UNICORN	"ZUZU"I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. I have seen it on a few characters such as weddingcake, a few days ago PM Reply Quote [quote="MY_UNICORN"][quote="ZUZU"]I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. [/quote] I have seen it on a few characters such as weddingcake, a few days ago [/quote]	#4 2026/08/02 13:35:46
SHYLO	"ZUZU"I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. The autobots users would warp with wicked moral still warp abled at wicked then once kill for devil for spell. The Autobot with stat abuse has started. PM Reply Quote [quote="SHYLO"][quote="ZUZU"]I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. [/quote] The autobots users would warp with wicked moral still warp abled at wicked then once kill for devil for spell. The Autobot with stat abuse has started. [/quote]	#5 2026/08/03 00:49:41
SLIMBRADY	This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit. PM Reply Quote [quote="SLIMBRADY"]This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit.[/quote]	#6 2026/08/03 04:30:56
MY_UNICORN	"SLIMBRADY"This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit. That’s my understanding as well, but many of us have lost confidence in the fairness and balance of the decision-making process due to the communication methods being used and the perception that they can influence outcomes. Unbanning a select few players rather than applying the same approach to everyone still feels selective in nature. Before the Korean unbans are used as an example of why we should trust the process, it’s important to recognise how it appears from the outside. The impression many of us get is that certain players are being unbanned because there is a belief that doing so will encourage PvP activity and trigger a wider return of former players. If that is the strategy, I think it’s based on a misunderstanding of why many people left in the first place. In my view, you’re not even close to addressing the underlying issues. Selective unbans don’t rebuild trust; consistent and fair treatment for everyone does. PM Reply Quote [quote="MY_UNICORN"][quote="SLIMBRADY"]This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit.[/quote] That’s my understanding as well, but many of us have lost confidence in the fairness and balance of the decision-making process due to the communication methods being used and the perception that they can influence outcomes. Unbanning a select few players rather than applying the same approach to everyone still feels selective in nature. Before the Korean unbans are used as an example of why we should trust the process, it’s important to recognise how it appears from the outside. The impression many of us get is that certain players are being unbanned because there is a belief that doing so will encourage PvP activity and trigger a wider return of former players. If that is the strategy, I think it’s based on a misunderstanding of why many people left in the first place. In my view, you’re not even close to addressing the underlying issues. Selective unbans don’t rebuild trust; consistent and fair treatment for everyone does.[/quote]	#7 2026/08/03 07:19:45
SYLVERINE	"MY_UNICORN" "SLIMBRADY"This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit. That’s my understanding as well, but many of us have lost confidence in the fairness and balance of the decision-making process due to the communication methods being used and the perception that they can influence outcomes. Unbanning a select few players rather than applying the same approach to everyone still feels selective in nature. Before the Korean unbans are used as an example of why we should trust the process, it’s important to recognise how it appears from the outside. The impression many of us get is that certain players are being unbanned because there is a belief that doing so will encourage PvP activity and trigger a wider return of former players. If that is the strategy, I think it’s based on a misunderstanding of why many people left in the first place. In my view, you’re not even close to addressing the underlying issues. Selective unbans don’t rebuild trust; consistent and fair treatment for everyone does. Chatgpt Special. PM Reply Quote [quote="SYLVERINE"][quote="MY_UNICORN"][quote="SLIMBRADY"]This only worked in esoma because you would get a hp boost when you levelled. As con/hp is worked out as you go on this there would be no benefit.[/quote] That’s my understanding as well, but many of us have lost confidence in the fairness and balance of the decision-making process due to the communication methods being used and the perception that they can influence outcomes. Unbanning a select few players rather than applying the same approach to everyone still feels selective in nature. Before the Korean unbans are used as an example of why we should trust the process, it’s important to recognise how it appears from the outside. The impression many of us get is that certain players are being unbanned because there is a belief that doing so will encourage PvP activity and trigger a wider return of former players. If that is the strategy, I think it’s based on a misunderstanding of why many people left in the first place. In my view, you’re not even close to addressing the underlying issues. Selective unbans don’t rebuild trust; consistent and fair treatment for everyone does.[/quote] Chatgpt Special. [/quote]	#8 2026/08/03 07:47:15
WEDDINGCAKE	"MY_UNICORN" "ZUZU"I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. I have seen it on a few characters such as weddingcake, a few days ago What are you talking about 🤣🤣🤣 You’ve seen no such thing. You’re so fucking strange it’s unreal, obsessed with bringing my name into every post… PM Reply Quote [quote="WEDDINGCAKE"][quote="MY_UNICORN"][quote="ZUZU"]I can only assume you mean me, i went devil moral to get the black aoe spell by killing Isolate. I know i could of killed guild stones however the run would have been horrendous to conti castle without being able to use warps. [/quote] I have seen it on a few characters such as weddingcake, a few days ago [/quote] What are you talking about 🤣🤣🤣 You’ve seen no such thing. You’re so fucking strange it’s unreal, obsessed with bringing my name into every post…[/quote]	#9 2026/08/03 08:33:13
WEDDINGCAKE	Talking absolute waffle as usual… PM Reply Quote [quote="WEDDINGCAKE"]Talking absolute waffle as usual… [url=https://freeimage.host/i/CU5Ay3Q][img]https://iili.io/CU5Ay3Q.md.png[/img][/url][/quote]	#10 2026/08/03 08:35:05
ZUZU	Im not even sure what im getting accused of 🤣 Zuzu is long capped, what benefit (other than going devil moral for a spell) have i gained? Crazy PM Reply Quote [quote="ZUZU"]Im not even sure what im getting accused of 🤣 Zuzu is long capped, what benefit (other than going devil moral for a spell) have i gained? Crazy[/quote]	#11 2026/08/03 15:23:32

Please sign in with one of your characters to reply

1