Back to Home

Myth of Soma Account Management

By clicking GO to login you are agreeing to the terms and conditions and privacy policy. > Register an Account > Forgot your password?

The Forum

Keen eyes to +2 attack on access

Author Content Date
Can this be implemented please? Melee needs a boost, and this would help a lot, would also make melee and int upgrades fair, seems as clean tablets add 2 ma to access, I think keen eyes should add the same but normal attack.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="HURRICANE"]Can this be implemented please? Melee needs a boost, and this would help a lot, would also make melee and int upgrades fair, seems as clean tablets add 2 ma to access, I think keen eyes should add the same but normal attack. [/quote]
+1
PM Reply Quote
[quote="SKATT420"]+1[/quote]
"HURRICANE"Melee needs a boost


lol'd
PM Reply Quote
[quote="JPOT"][quote="HURRICANE"]Melee needs a boost[/quote] lol'd[/quote]
+1
PM Reply Quote
[quote="TOLIC"]+1[/quote]
+1
PM Reply Quote
[quote="CEO_008"]+1[/quote]
Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has
PM Reply Quote
[quote="LOVEFILM"]Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has[/quote]
"LOVEFILM"Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has


It is your post that makes 0 sense.

Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame.

For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....
PM Reply Quote
[quote="ISISE"][quote="LOVEFILM"]Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has[/quote] It is your post that makes 0 sense. Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame. For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....[/quote]
"ISISE"
"LOVEFILM"Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has


It is your post that makes 0 sense.

Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame.

For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....


another guy who has no clue

PM Reply Quote
[quote="RAXER"][quote="ISISE"][quote="LOVEFILM"]Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has[/quote] It is your post that makes 0 sense. Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame. For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....[/quote] another guy who has no clue [/quote]
"ISISE"
"LOVEFILM"Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has


It is your post that makes 0 sense.

Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame.

For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....


definately no clue. Especially now pingzapper is used and spells cast at speed A. Also mages have dodge aura now. Mages have weaken.

Do u even play this game?
PM Reply Quote
[quote="HURRICANE"][quote="ISISE"][quote="LOVEFILM"]Bump can this be looked at? Makes 0 sense that melee doesn't have the same upgrade that int has[/quote] It is your post that makes 0 sense. Just because there isnt an equivalent doesn't mean it should be ingame. For example Melle weapons have toes, we dont see mages asking for toe equivalent to make spells faster....[/quote] definately no clue. Especially now pingzapper is used and spells cast at speed A. Also mages have dodge aura now. Mages have weaken. Do u even play this game?[/quote]
Ping zapper is used by those who pay.

Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them.

Weaken? Have you heard of serums?

Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="S0RCERER"]Ping zapper is used by those who pay. Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them. Weaken? Have you heard of serums? Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.[/quote]
"S0RCERER"Ping zapper is used by those who pay.

Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them.

Weaken? Have you heard of serums?

Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.


hardly a valid point when he gives a silly example.

serious lack of mobs which drop RDT - needs improvement.

Ke's adding +1 attack - needs to be made to give +2 so str chars can actually gear up better.

if clean tablets added +1 MA nobody would give a toss about them,

if mages are worried about casting, maybe they should have gone for more dex and make a better evasion set?

PM Reply Quote
[quote="BRUUTE"][quote="S0RCERER"]Ping zapper is used by those who pay. Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them. Weaken? Have you heard of serums? Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.[/quote] hardly a valid point when he gives a silly example. serious lack of mobs which drop RDT - needs improvement. Ke's adding +1 attack - needs to be made to give +2 so str chars can actually gear up better. if clean tablets added +1 MA nobody would give a toss about them, if mages are worried about casting, maybe they should have gone for more dex and make a better evasion set? [/quote]
"S0RCERER"Ping zapper is used by those who pay.

Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them.

Weaken? Have you heard of serums?

Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.


Whereas I usually agree with your, mages on hsoma have mental ma+ compared to melee. With x4 +3 CT access that's +24ma. To get +24 attack you require +6 x4 of the melee counter part. Serums for qeaken yes, could say the same about slow for melee classes. Anyone with a 6% set, 95/100 dex and staff dodge will usually avoid alot of melee attacks unless the other person has a 550 recoil bow with full acc set. This has been tested between numerous builds with different weapons and the mage generally wins because of the cast speed and the 100% hit rate.

Keen eyes give +1 attack and nobody gives a toss about them and this thread is the exact reason why nobody gives a toss about them.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="LOVEFILM"][quote="S0RCERER"]Ping zapper is used by those who pay. Staff dodge is 6%, hardly sufficient to cast whilst someone with a speed upgraded weapon interrupts them. Weaken? Have you heard of serums? Whoever that is, he makes a valid point. Denying it is silly.[/quote] Whereas I usually agree with your, mages on hsoma have mental ma+ compared to melee. With x4 +3 CT access that's +24ma. To get +24 attack you require +6 x4 of the melee counter part. Serums for qeaken yes, could say the same about slow for melee classes. Anyone with a 6% set, 95/100 dex and staff dodge will usually avoid alot of melee attacks unless the other person has a 550 recoil bow with full acc set. This has been tested between numerous builds with different weapons and the mage generally wins because of the cast speed and the 100% hit rate. Keen eyes give +1 attack and nobody gives a toss about them and this thread is the exact reason why nobody gives a toss about them.[/quote]
As in the other thread, I agree KE's should give +2 attack, but saying it's needed because mages have weaken, have 2nd staff aura and might use Ping Zapper is really silly.

FAO Hurricane: I did notice you're using proc set, with your int, may I ask why?

I would imagine on the rare occasion you decide to use magic to pvp, you're not using flame arrow, because it does jack diddly versus people with 100+ in.

Each proc you activate will do minimum damage versus any boss or player with 100+int.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="S0RCERER"]As in the other thread, I agree KE's should give +2 attack, but saying it's needed because mages have weaken, have 2nd staff aura and might use Ping Zapper is really silly. FAO Hurricane: I did notice you're using proc set, with your int, may I ask why? I would imagine on the rare occasion you decide to use magic to pvp, you're not using flame arrow, because it does jack diddly versus people with 100+ in. Each proc you activate will do minimum damage versus any boss or player with 100+int.[/quote]
I've put this change in the to do list.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="GHOSTLORD"]I've put this change in the to do list.[/quote]
"S0RCERER"As in the other thread, I agree KE's should give +2 attack, but saying it's needed because mages have weaken, have 2nd staff aura and might use Ping Zapper is really silly.

FAO Hurricane: I did notice you're using proc set, with your int, may I ask why?

I would imagine on the rare occasion you decide to use magic to pvp, you're not using flame arrow, because it does jack diddly versus people with 100+ in.

Each proc you activate will do minimum damage versus any boss or player with 100+int.


Ive never used proc for pvp lol, youve only ever seen me use it on dummy.. whats that got to do with it? I use str rings and accuracy armour for pvp, that would just be stupid using proc with 100int lol.
PM Reply Quote
[quote="HURRICANE"][quote="S0RCERER"]As in the other thread, I agree KE's should give +2 attack, but saying it's needed because mages have weaken, have 2nd staff aura and might use Ping Zapper is really silly. FAO Hurricane: I did notice you're using proc set, with your int, may I ask why? I would imagine on the rare occasion you decide to use magic to pvp, you're not using flame arrow, because it does jack diddly versus people with 100+ in. Each proc you activate will do minimum damage versus any boss or player with 100+int.[/quote] Ive never used proc for pvp lol, youve only ever seen me use it on dummy.. whats that got to do with it? I use str rings and accuracy armour for pvp, that would just be stupid using proc with 100int lol. [/quote]

 

Please sign in with one of your characters to reply