| Author | Content | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
ACVX |
"GHOSTLORD""DENZEL"This isn't just to do with bans, it's the way you treat people and make sly insults without them being able to say or do anything because you literally just ban their character for no reason. Look at how many people and guilds had a mass exodus because of you. So right ;p ( joke btw b4 u give me more ;p)
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="ACVX"][quote="GHOSTLORD"][quote="DENZEL"]This isn't just to do with bans, it's the way you treat people and make sly insults without them being able to say or do anything because you literally just ban their character for no reason. Look at how many people and guilds had a mass exodus because of you.
Manual removed due to Dan being unable to take constructive criticism. [/quote]
That's so 2015 mate. I'm the one to hate now. Stay with the times!
[/quote]
So right ;p ( joke btw b4 u give me more ;p)[/quote]
|
#106 2017/01/02 17:54:08 |
|
ASBJORN |
I would go with no pking at mags I'll you remove mags stone ability at same time . That's just from my only time I've ever gone there a something happened lol !
|
#107 2017/01/02 18:00:52 |
|
DENZEL |
"INTHEFACE" I only came back to post for two reasons. Dan has been saying we've been following him around in game, unsure why but if thats what keeps him going okay. Secondly because he keeps spouting the same crap. The fact he has referred to "I've allowed your opinion" says it all. You're not a God, you're a GM of an online game with a user count less than 100. If you removed your head from your ass Dan you'd actually realise that you're cancerous for the game.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="DENZEL"]
[quote="INTHEFACE"]
Dan has every reason to ban me but hasn't so your argument is just idiotic
the fact that your on here being a absolute twat just shows how big your care face is
im glad dan keep's and will continue to keep pricks like you banned [/quote]
I only came back to post for two reasons. Dan has been saying we've been following him around in game, unsure why but if thats what keeps him going okay. Secondly because he keeps spouting the same crap. The fact he has referred to "I've allowed your opinion" says it all.
You're not a God, you're a GM of an online game with a user count less than 100. If you removed your head from your ass Dan you'd actually realise that you're cancerous for the game. [/quote]
|
#108 2017/01/02 18:07:02 |
|
ISYLVER [Staff] |
"DENZEL""INTHEFACE" UC has hit 200+ recently. I'm not sure what to say to you. You've made your peace now move on. My association with this server will not change - some like that, some don't but the realisation of this is key to enjoy the game.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="ISYLVER"][quote="DENZEL"]
[quote="INTHEFACE"]
Dan has every reason to ban me but hasn't so your argument is just idiotic
the fact that your on here being a absolute twat just shows how big your care face is
im glad dan keep's and will continue to keep pricks like you banned [/quote]
I only came back to post for two reasons. Dan has been saying we've been following him around in game, unsure why but if thats what keeps him going okay. Secondly because he keeps spouting the same crap. The fact he has referred to "I've allowed your opinion" says it all. You're not a God, you're a GM of an online game with a user count less than 100. If you removed your head from your ass Dan you'd actually realise that you're cancerous for the game. [/quote]
UC has hit 200+ recently. I'm not sure what to say to you. You've made your peace now move on.
My association with this server will not change - some like that, some don't but the realisation of this is key to enjoy the game. [/quote]
|
#109 2017/01/02 18:08:44 |
|
DENZEL |
"ISYLVER" UC of 200+ with people multiboxing with 5 characters at once while they all sit and hit a Gorshak? Come on Dan, don't spout crap. Said my piece, you'll probably ignore it as you always do with anyone else's feedback who doesn't already have their tongue firmly planted.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="DENZEL"][quote="ISYLVER"]
UC has hit 200+ recently. I'm not sure what to say to you. You've made your peace now move on.
My association with this server will not change - some like that, some don't but the realisation of this is key to enjoy the game. [/quote]
UC of 200+ with people multiboxing with 5 characters at once while they all sit and hit a Gorshak? Come on Dan, don't spout crap.
Said my piece, you'll probably ignore it as you always do with anyone else's feedback who doesn't already have their tongue firmly planted. [/quote]
|
#110 2017/01/02 18:10:28 |
|
ISYLVER [Staff] |
"DENZEL""ISYLVER" 200 users is 200 concurrent users. I'm fine with that :). Or 1,012 accounts have logged on in the past week. Soma is in its most healthy state it has ever been in and that is certainly a positive. Yes we've had some points of contention regarding GVW/Pking recently etc - which has led to some great ideas by the community. I particularly like some of gandalfs ideas on the GVW thread.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="ISYLVER"][quote="DENZEL"][quote="ISYLVER"]
UC has hit 200+ recently. I'm not sure what to say to you. You've made your peace now move on.
My association with this server will not change - some like that, some don't but the realisation of this is key to enjoy the game. [/quote]
UC of 200+ with people multiboxing with 5 characters at once while they all sit and hit a Gorshak? Come on Dan, don't spout crap.
Said my piece, you'll probably ignore it as you always do with anyone else's feedback who doesn't already have their tongue firmly planted. [/quote]
200 users is 200 concurrent users. I'm fine with that :). Or 1,012 accounts have logged on in the past week.
Soma is in its most healthy state it has ever been in and that is certainly a positive. Yes we've had some points of contention regarding GVW/Pking recently etc - which has led to some great ideas by the community.
I particularly like some of gandalfs ideas on the GVW thread.
[/quote]
|
#111 2017/01/02 18:13:04 |
|
ACVX |
what thread is this? i see nowt from gandalf
|
#112 2017/01/02 18:17:45 |
|
ISYLVER [Staff] |
"ACVX"what thread is this? i see nowt from gandalf See in ideas and suggestions section :) |
#113 2017/01/02 18:19:55 |
|
ACVX |
ah k
|
#114 2017/01/02 18:20:21 |
|
ACVX |
"ACVX"Best way to encourage more pk imo... is to drop the losing of items.....Players sweat their little roundies off to make/ find good items....The thought of losing them is a huge factor in the lack of pvp.. Sill prefer this... and ye.. turn off pk anywhere near gvw for its duration .. guild alliances and % reductions for both guilds sounds ok...but .. if they didnt officially 'allie' then would be no % reduction for the guilds that help? PK proly the biggest problem in the game and causes most arguments and complaints and whining. take away the risk factor... encourage more ppl to have a go.... and make it less ''dangerous'' and ppl might get stuck in more ..
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="ACVX"][quote="ACVX"]Best way to encourage more pk imo... is to drop the losing of items.....Players sweat their little roundies off to make/ find good items....The thought of losing them is a huge factor in the lack of pvp..
carebear maybe...but ..if ppl didnt lose stuff..or the possibiity of it, they might go have a good fight.. win or not.
People can live with a few pks or deaths...but lose a 5% eva pads or an A speed bow... then things take on a whole different meaning.
i think this is why ppl get touchy and so emotional bout pk.
Also.. make the pvp attack option to +/- 10 levels... then the old timers cant go round bashin lev 70s willy nilly.
Also .. get the cap+ patch in asap .. then ppl will have things to hunt and level for.. keep things calmer.. and the more higher levs we get ..the less of the lower levs can get pkd by them.
The cap + might also bring back a few older players and the chance for more guilds to have a few lev 100s in them..rather than all being in dl1 or dl2[/quote]
Sill prefer this... and ye.. turn off pk anywhere near gvw for its duration .. guild alliances and % reductions for both guilds sounds ok...but .. if they didnt officially 'allie' then would be no % reduction for the guilds that help?
PK proly the biggest problem in the game and causes most arguments and complaints and whining.
take away the risk factor... encourage more ppl to have a go.... and make it less ''dangerous'' and ppl might get stuck in more ..[/quote]
|
#115 2017/01/02 18:31:48 |
|
BRITKING95 |
"ACVX""ACVX"Best way to encourage more pk imo... is to drop the losing of items.....Players sweat their little roundies off to make/ find good items....The thought of losing them is a huge factor in the lack of pvp.. Ok so how does this balance things out if going into red and not being able to come out easily is also accompanied by no items dropped on pk, Surely if it gets harder to be a pker the risk/reward should be looked at like items being easier dropped ect PK'ing is part of the game the graveyard wh ect was made for PKERS or atleast it was used by them more than anyone else, we should NOT kill Pkers off of the game it is a role playing game where you escape real life and be who you want to be why shouldn't you be able to rob people by killing them and taking there stuff.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="BRITKING95"][quote="ACVX"][quote="ACVX"]Best way to encourage more pk imo... is to drop the losing of items.....Players sweat their little roundies off to make/ find good items....The thought of losing them is a huge factor in the lack of pvp..
carebear maybe...but ..if ppl didnt lose stuff..or the possibiity of it, they might go have a good fight.. win or not.
People can live with a few pks or deaths...but lose a 5% eva pads or an A speed bow... then things take on a whole different meaning.
i think this is why ppl get touchy and so emotional bout pk.
Also.. make the pvp attack option to +/- 10 levels... then the old timers cant go round bashin lev 70s willy nilly.
Also .. get the cap+ patch in asap .. then ppl will have things to hunt and level for.. keep things calmer.. and the more higher levs we get ..the less of the lower levs can get pkd by them.
The cap + might also bring back a few older players and the chance for more guilds to have a few lev 100s in them..rather than all being in dl1 or dl2[/quote]
Sill prefer this... and ye.. turn off pk anywhere near gvw for its duration .. guild alliances and % reductions for both guilds sounds ok...but .. if they didnt officially 'allie' then would be no % reduction for the guilds that help?
PK proly the biggest problem in the game and causes most arguments and complaints and whining.
take away the risk factor... encourage more ppl to have a go.... and make it less ''dangerous'' and ppl might get stuck in more ..[/quote]
Ok so how does this balance things out if going into red and not being able to come out easily is also accompanied by no items dropped on pk, Surely if it gets harder to be a pker the risk/reward should be looked at like items being easier dropped ect PK'ing is part of the game the graveyard wh ect was made for PKERS or atleast it was used by them more than anyone else, we should NOT kill Pkers off of the game it is a role playing game where you escape real life and be who you want to be why shouldn't you be able to rob people by killing them and taking there stuff.[/quote]
|
#116 2017/01/02 19:31:13 |
|
ACVX |
Going into ''deep red'' is hard work to implement as dan said.
No need to implement this. Remove risk of dropping items.. encourage more players to participate in pk. No risk... more pk... more ''gameplay.. more fun... and more time for them to introduce cap+ patch which will hopefully bring a few lev 100s back. maybe some of them will join different guilds to dl1 or dl2.... spread the love .. spread the stats.. spread the players around a bit. Apart from a bit of playing around last night.. there is no pk on the server...... Dl1 Dl2 ....dl ''friendly guilds'' there is no pk.... All the moans about it...... No1 likes to pk because of the risk of losing items. Remove that risk, maybe more ppl will have a bash at it. Thats why dl have so many brown nosers ... threats of pk, ppl just dont go near it. You can see from player feeds from last few months. Pk just doesnt ( hardly happens) Upgraded items are hard to get..and the more players get..the less likely they are to risk it. It really is that simple.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="ACVX"]Going into ''deep red'' is hard work to implement as dan said.
No need to implement this.
Remove risk of dropping items.. encourage more players to participate in pk.
No risk... more pk... more ''gameplay.. more fun... and more time for them to introduce cap+ patch which will hopefully bring a few lev 100s back.
maybe some of them will join different guilds to dl1 or dl2.... spread the love .. spread the stats.. spread the players around a bit.
Apart from a bit of playing around last night.. there is no pk on the server......
Dl1 Dl2 ....dl ''friendly guilds'' there is no pk....
All the moans about it......
No1 likes to pk because of the risk of losing items.
Remove that risk, maybe more ppl will have a bash at it.
Thats why dl have so many brown nosers ... threats of pk, ppl just dont go near it. You can see from player feeds from last few months. Pk just doesnt ( hardly happens)
Upgraded items are hard to get..and the more players get..the less likely they are to risk it. It really is that simple.
[/quote]
|
#117 2017/01/02 19:38:39 |
|
WILLOW |
"HURRICANE"Can we not just make it so no pking at magmas? It's only Mob level 100s can really hunt. Cheers dan. No one spot is better or we have the likes of Alakazam stealing drops when we're stoned and drops are out of reach, Ide like to see grab range further please, Bit below the belt Ala Another good reason why pk should never be turned off, cant be robbing other mans ct's and ep's Its law. Top end hunting mob and no one cared when we all wanted mags a pk free spot.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="WILLOW"][quote="HURRICANE"]Can we not just make it so no pking at magmas? It's only Mob level 100s can really hunt. Cheers dan.[/quote]
No one spot is better or we have the likes of Alakazam stealing drops when we're stoned and drops are out of reach, Ide like to see grab range further please, Bit below the belt Ala Another good reason why pk should never be turned off, cant be robbing other mans ct's and ep's Its law.
Top end hunting mob and no one cared when we all wanted mags a pk free spot.[/quote]
|
#118 2017/01/02 19:59:47 |
|
RTPR |
What is all this about people standing there and "letting you PK them". As the PK'er it is you pulling the trigger, nobody forces you to do so. You choose to PK and you therefore choose the consequences.
Some seem to be suggesting punitive restrictions on others if PK'ers are suddenly restricted, a sort of reward if you will. The reward for PK'ing should be; the potential for items to drop from others - this alone is an extremely valuable reward, you may potentially end up with the best axe, bow etc in the game, monopolising a spawn spot for a period of time, one-upmanship on others. If PK'ing is restricted ESoma style simply ensure that items can drop as a result of being PK'd. Do not forget that PK'ing is supposed to be rewarding from a role-playing point of view. It is not used as role-play here it is just used to sort out petty arguments that end with the GMs restricting it. It is intended to be the role-play of an outlaw; you run around killing others, dodging their guildmates trying to get back at you but you do not care, you live life on the dark side, you sometimes get a good drop out of it and can make others run out of a spawn spot that you wish to make use of.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="RTPR"]What is all this about people standing there and "letting you PK them". As the PK'er it is you pulling the trigger, nobody forces you to do so. You choose to PK and you therefore choose the consequences.
Some seem to be suggesting punitive restrictions on others if PK'ers are suddenly restricted, a sort of reward if you will. The reward for PK'ing should be; the potential for items to drop from others - this alone is an extremely valuable reward, you may potentially end up with the best axe, bow etc in the game, monopolising a spawn spot for a period of time, one-upmanship on others. If PK'ing is restricted ESoma style simply ensure that items can drop as a result of being PK'd. Do not forget that PK'ing is supposed to be rewarding from a role-playing point of view. It is not used as role-play here it is just used to sort out petty arguments that end with the GMs restricting it. It is intended to be the role-play of an outlaw; you run around killing others, dodging their guildmates trying to get back at you but you do not care, you live life on the dark side, you sometimes get a good drop out of it and can make others run out of a spawn spot that you wish to make use of. [/quote]
|
#119 2017/01/02 22:25:03 |
|
JHAELIEN |
Lost count the amount of times I've killed someone and they've warped usually by some sort of disconnection and dropped only barr while being fully kitted out.
|
#120 2017/01/02 22:50:04 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply