The Forum

"MIKELOWREY"Can we put at number 8:
Reignite the test server and start testing important things with the help of the community if needed, before implementing things like new items/upgrades/boss changes/new spells, even new maps like Fox's improved Pranda.

"ROKEN"

"MIKELOWREY"Can we put at number 8:
Reignite the test server and start testing important things with the help of the community if needed, before implementing things like new items/upgrades/boss changes/new spells, even new maps like Fox's improved Pranda.

this, wasnt the test server put up for us to test new stuff for the gms?

"DEIMOS"

"ROKEN"

"MIKELOWREY"Can we put at number 8:
Reignite the test server and start testing important things with the help of the community if needed, before implementing things like new items/upgrades/boss changes/new spells, even new maps like Fox's improved Pranda.

this, wasnt the test server put up for us to test new stuff for the gms?

Only the stat change patch i believe

@mike i have edited the original post, if we get others adapting/addjng the list i will change accordingly

"BINKS"Limiting Proc to x2

"OGC"

"BINKS"Limiting Proc to x2

+1 providing melee weapons speed is limited to 700 barring knuckle.

To do this a new tier of weapon would need to be introduced, new weapons with way higher damage than current weapons have, enough to make people NEED to use the new weapons.

Of course new armour would also need to be introduced, players' damage is already crazy and additional damage would need to be compensated.

If this is refused, 5th staff aura should be given to humans instead.

"OGC"

"BINKS"Limiting Proc to x2

+1 providing melee weapons speed is limited to 700 barring knuckle.

To do this a new tier of weapon would need to be introduced, new weapons with way higher damage than current weapons have, enough to make people NEED to use the new weapons.

Of course new armour would also need to be introduced, players' damage is already crazy and additional damage would need to be compensated.

If this is refused, 5th staff aura should be given to humans instead.

"DEIMOS"

"OGC"

"BINKS"Limiting Proc to x2

+1 providing melee weapons speed is limited to 700 barring knuckle.

To do this a new tier of weapon would need to be introduced, new weapons with way higher damage than current weapons have, enough to make people NEED to use the new weapons.

Of course new armour would also need to be introduced, players' damage is already crazy and additional damage would need to be compensated.

If this is refused, 5th staff aura should be given to humans instead.

The biggest issue here is that if the step up is too high (which is needed to persuade away from silly recoil) it will absolutely tear through lower levelsthat cabt yet wear the new armours, whilst making old weps do very little damage to new armour wearers

Having 5th axe AND 4th staff qould be a little op

"DEIMOS"Though we could evaluate the various suggested changes and number them to ask isylver for a yay or nay possibilities before they get discussed

1. Revert name change for GVW (heavily supported)
2. Introduce no names to SS to reduce x-world partnership
3. Change how stat system works on dsoma - high the stat more points req
4. Level 2+ spells dsoma heal weak etc maybe hunting spell
5. Auras - Introduce CTF slow for low range chars / directional port mage / time delay to change wep after 5th axe
6. Negamare kickback to reduce the ridiculous blocking out of range1 chars and refusing to kill ads to block them
7. DSoma new access (Preferably rings)
8. Launch test server for proper testing of new suggestions
9. Limit proc amount per cast to x2
10. Free rested until 100? To promote new chars without double events, there is no benefit to social vs hardcore players at this stage for the earlier levels?

"GRIMPIRATE"

"DEIMOS"Though we could evaluate the various suggested changes and number them to ask isylver for a yay or nay possibilities before they get discussed

1. Revert name change for GVW (heavily supported)
2. Introduce no names to SS to reduce x-world partnership
3. Change how stat system works on dsoma - high the stat more points req
4. Level 2+ spells dsoma heal weak etc maybe hunting spell
5. Auras - Introduce CTF slow for low range chars / directional port mage / time delay to change wep after 5th axe
6. Negamare kickback to reduce the ridiculous blocking out of range1 chars and refusing to kill ads to block them
7. DSoma new access (Preferably rings)
8. Launch test server for proper testing of new suggestions
9. Limit proc amount per cast to x2
10. Free rested until 100? To promote new chars without double events, there is no benefit to social vs hardcore players at this stage for the earlier levels?

1. Don't think its heavily supported. I'm growing to really like the tactics behind it.
2. Yea 100%
3. dno
4. dno
5. 100% - the invulnerability would open up new dimensions to pvp also
6. yes
7. dno
8. prob not gonna happen
9. No, 3 procs is fine. Multiple db at once is prob not. DB set etc should be removed. 3 DB procs at once is ridiculous.
10. Yes 100% , especially as cap becomes higher

"BINKS"

"GRIMPIRATE"

"DEIMOS"Though we could evaluate the various suggested changes and number them to ask isylver for a yay or nay possibilities before they get discussed

1. Revert name change for GVW (heavily supported)
2. Introduce no names to SS to reduce x-world partnership
3. Change how stat system works on dsoma - high the stat more points req
4. Level 2+ spells dsoma heal weak etc maybe hunting spell
5. Auras - Introduce CTF slow for low range chars / directional port mage / time delay to change wep after 5th axe
6. Negamare kickback to reduce the ridiculous blocking out of range1 chars and refusing to kill ads to block them
7. DSoma new access (Preferably rings)
8. Launch test server for proper testing of new suggestions
9. Limit proc amount per cast to x2
10. Free rested until 100? To promote new chars without double events, there is no benefit to social vs hardcore players at this stage for the earlier levels?

1. Don't think its heavily supported. I'm growing to really like the tactics behind it.
2. Yea 100%
3. dno
4. dno
5. 100% - the invulnerability would open up new dimensions to pvp also
6. yes
7. dno
8. prob not gonna happen
9. No, 3 procs is fine. Multiple db at once is prob not. DB set etc should be removed. 3 DB procs at once is ridiculous.
10. Yes 100% , especially as cap becomes higher

Number 1 is one of the most asked for things in posts on the forum ?
You do realise you can proc more than 3 times in a hit right ?
Agree test server is a must