Author | Content | Date |
---|---|---|
LUPISCUS |
didnt kno u had 150+ skill jah .... ddint kno u did ur own upgrades tbh
|
#136 2017/01/21 19:30:00 |
JHAELIEN |
You learn something new everyday.
|
#137 2017/01/21 19:32:57 |
LUPISCUS |
on the ''rolling odds'' or ''accumulator'' tables as listed somewhere else.......... then surely fails would help? or is my maths not very good?
I got no great gear..coz i aint done that much upgrading...but my hunch is.. fails do help..u can see a pattern of success/ fails..and altho far from failproof... there is some sort of pattern/cycle going on
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="LUPISCUS"]on the ''rolling odds'' or ''accumulator'' tables as listed somewhere else.......... then surely fails would help? or is my maths not very good?
I got no great gear..coz i aint done that much upgrading...but my hunch is.. fails do help..u can see a pattern of success/ fails..and altho far from failproof... there is some sort of pattern/cycle going on[/quote]
|
#138 2017/01/21 19:35:23 |
OPENTHEDOOR |
The only thing that works is making back ups.
|
#139 2017/01/21 19:43:02 |
JHAELIEN |
"OPENTHEDOOR"The only thing that works is making back ups. This, you'll never catch me upgrading anything I only have one of, some people do it and it works for them but from personal experience my shit always fails. |
#140 2017/01/21 19:46:20 |
THE7THSEAL |
[Legendary] Halberd of Might+5 Attack : 34~70 Weight : 16 Durability : 3562 Speed : A+(638) Req. Str : 102 Req. Skill : 127 backups were hard to find |
#141 2017/01/21 19:46:23 |
JHAELIEN |
Seen similar attack intense hom-m's that could have served as a back up to that tbh.
|
#142 2017/01/21 19:48:05 |
THE7THSEAL |
surprised u aint seen better training axes tbh
|
#143 2017/01/21 19:50:08 |
MONSTERMAN |
[Legendary] Pike+5 Attack : 50~68 Weight : 14 Durability : 1753 Speed : A(759) Req. Str : 106 Req. Skill : 137 52 failers later. oh right it doesnt work. |
#144 2017/01/21 19:54:25 |
OPENTHEDOOR |
I've ripped 6/7 intense BWA's with 65/66/67 max attacks. Back ups are there just need to find them.
|
#145 2017/01/21 19:56:32 |
LUPISCUS |
me n monster used fails...and no back ups required ;p
Just luck i guess ^ |
#146 2017/01/21 20:04:17 |
JARAGOONDOO |
And I know someone that made an item 0 to +6 without fails (DT).
The best I've done is make an item from 0 to +4 in 10 seconds (ToW, no fails, just dragged the same items in 4 times consecutively) What's your point Lupi and MM? Your and mine anecdotal evidence means nothing in the grand scheme of things We sometimes get lucky. That's all there is to it.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="JARAGOONDOO"]And I know someone that made an item 0 to +6 without fails (DT).
The best I've done is make an item from 0 to +4 in 10 seconds (ToW, no fails, just dragged the same items in 4 times consecutively)
What's your point Lupi and MM? Your and mine anecdotal evidence means nothing in the grand scheme of things
We sometimes get lucky. That's all there is to it.[/quote]
|
#147 2017/01/21 20:13:31 |
LUPISCUS |
No point at all. Was simply asking if the ''rolling tables'' as described by flick earlier..... would be affected postivley by using fails.?
Thats what i was asking and would like opinions to Using the rolling odds..and maths involved.. it seems compelling evidence that using fails must help? Dunno...right or wrong?
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="LUPISCUS"]No point at all. Was simply asking if the ''rolling tables'' as described by flick earlier..... would be affected postivley by using fails.?
Thats what i was asking and would like opinions to
Using the rolling odds..and maths involved.. it seems compelling evidence that using fails must help?
Dunno...right or wrong?[/quote]
|
#148 2017/01/21 20:17:45 |
JHAELIEN |
"THE7THSEAL"surprised u aint seen better training axes tbh Seen 71 max intense hom-m's, more than back up material, as openthedoor said there's a backup for everything. Intense M tags are on par with their regular legendary counterparts. |
#149 2017/01/21 20:23:30 |
JARAGOONDOO |
"LUPISCUS"No point at all. Was simply asking if the ''rolling tables'' as described by flick earlier..... would be affected postiveily by using fails.? Oh, ok. My apologies. When i read your last comment I thought you were being sarcastic. My bad. My opinion on fails is they DO make a difference. But that difference is neither negative or positive (so there's no point using them). That's the nature of RNG.
PM
Reply
Quote
[quote="JARAGOONDOO"][quote="LUPISCUS"]No point at all. Was simply asking if the ''rolling tables'' as described by flick earlier..... would be affected postiveily by using fails.?
Thats what i was asking and would like opinions to[/quote]
Oh, ok. My apologies. When i read your last comment I thought you were being sarcastic. My bad.
My opinion on fails is they DO make a difference. But that difference is neither negative or positive (so there's no point using them). That's the nature of RNG.[/quote]
|
#150 2017/01/21 20:23:39 |
Please sign in with one of your characters to reply